AI Intake & Operations Governance for Law Firms · Capture Every Inquiry. Enforce Every Follow-Up. Keep Full Control.
Solo attorneys and small boutique firms are losing cases at intake, not at trial. After-hours calls, inconsistent follow-up, language barriers, and staff turnover are silently draining your caseload. R.I.G.S.™ closes those gaps without removing you from control.
Personal Injury SSA / SSDI Veterans Disability Workers' Comp ERISA / LTD Immigration
Spanish & Other Languages Available — 24/7 Multilingual Intake Coverage
⚖️ ABA Ethics Aligned 👤 Human-in-the-Loop— always 🔒 Governed Data Handling
📋 Your Script. Your Rules. 🕐24/7— after hours covered 🏛️ Built forSolo & Boutique Firms
Founder & Forensic Vocational Expert — Precision AI Group
Allan founded Precision AI Group after 10,000+ SSA hearings, forensic vocational work, and leading disability intake operations.
He has watched exactly how early information capture either builds winning cases — or lets them slip away.
That real-world forensic mindset now powers our governed AI systems. Every intake protocol in R.I.G.S.™ was designed by someone who has sat across the table from ALJs, reviewed thousands of case files, and understands what structured, consistent intake actually means for case outcomes.
This isn't a tech company that learned law. It's a legal operations expert who built AI infrastructure around the realities of practice.
10,000+ SSA HearingsForensic Vocational ExpertDisability Intake OperationsABA Ethics Aligned
Your Firm Isn't Missing Cases Because of Skill.
It's Missing Them Because Your System Can't Be Everywhere at Once — But Your AI Competitor Can.
These aren't hypothetical risks. They are the intake failure patterns that repeat across solo and boutique firms every week — silently, without a clear line item on any report.
Enterprise AI platforms are built for high-volume shops with large staffs. R.I.G.S.™ is sized and priced for solo attorneys and boutique firms — without enterprise overhead or complexity.
Every deployment starts with control points, audit trails, and defined approval rules — not automation first, governance first.
AI captures, routes, and summarizes. Your team makes every decision. No autonomous actions without defined human review.
Intake sequences, escalation logic, and routing rules are defined by your firm — not preset by a vendor with no knowledge of your practice.
We start with one gap, one workflow. No big-bang deployments. Fundamentals before scale — every time.
R.I.G.S.™ is not a replacement for attorney judgment. It is the infrastructure that enforces the intake standards your firm sets — consistently, at scale, without requiring your team to be available every hour of every day.
The attorneys who should be most skeptical of AI vendors are exactly the ones we built R.I.G.S.™ for. Here are the most common concerns — and honest answers.
R.I.G.S.™ does not make decisions. It captures information, routes according to rules your firm defines, and delivers review-ready summaries to your team. Every decision stays with you. The system enforces your process — it does not replace your judgment.
Valid concern. Our deployment uses structured, scripted intake sequences — not open-ended generative AI. The system asks defined questions and captures structured responses. There is no AI improvising with your clients. Hallucination risk is governed out of the workflow by design.
We build around ABA ethics guidelines from day one — not as an afterthought. Supervision, disclosure, and human review are built into every workflow. We map your jurisdiction's specific requirements before deployment. Compliance is a design requirement, not a checkbox.
R.I.G.S.™ handles first acknowledgement and structured capture — not the attorney relationship. Callers feel heard and started rather than ignored or sent to voicemail. The alternative — no answer at all — damages the relationship far more than a governed AI acknowledgement does.
No big-bang deployments. No pressure to automate everything at once. This is how every engagement begins.
We map your current workflow and identify your highest-exposure gaps — before any technology discussion.
We address one workflow gap — typically after-hours coverage — before expanding. Fundamentals before scale.
Scripts, routing logic, escalation rules, and approval points are defined by your firm before any system goes live.
You review performance, adjust rules, and decide if and when to expand. Nothing moves without your approval.
A free 20-minute intake review. We map your firm's exposure. You leave with clarity on what you're actually losing — whether we work together or not.
Request Your Free Intake Review → Review Our Ethics & Data StandardsR.I.G.S.™ is configured around the specific intake demands of each practice — not a one-size-fits-all script dropped into your firm.
PI intake is time-sensitive and emotionally charged. Callers are often in crisis, in pain, or immediately post-accident. Speed of acknowledgement and structured capture of incident details directly affect case quality and conversion.
SSA claimants are often elderly, disabled, or limited-English speakers navigating a confusing system. Consistent structured intake captures the medical history, denial history, and urgency signals that determine case prioritization.
Veterans often call once and don't follow up. First contact capture and immediate follow-up enforcement are critical — a missed call or delayed response is frequently a permanently lost client.
WC intake requires rapid capture of incident details, employer information, and injury timeline before memory fades. Structured intake sequences enforce completeness that unscripted staff conversations rarely achieve consistently.
ERISA callers are often mid-appeals process with tight deadlines. Intake must capture plan information, denial dates, and appeal status immediately — incomplete capture at first contact causes case-critical delays.
Immigration callers are frequently limited-English speakers in high-anxiety situations. Multilingual intake coverage and immediate acknowledgement are the difference between retained clients and callers who simply try the next number on their list.
Each practice area gets its own intake configuration — specific question sets, routing logic, escalation triggers, and language requirements defined by your firm before deployment.
R.I.G.S.™ is not a product name chosen for marketing appeal. Each letter reflects a deliberate design principle built around how law firms actually operate under real-world pressure.
Intake leakage is a revenue problem — not an administrative one. Every missed call, failed follow-up, and inconsistent capture has a direct case value attached to it.
The intake chain is the most failure-prone sequence in a boutique firm's operations. First contact, capture, routing, acknowledgement, and follow-up — each step is a point of potential loss.
Governance means defined rules, enforced consistently, with audit trails. Not AI doing what it thinks is best — AI executing what your firm has explicitly authorized.
A system that functions at low volume and high volume, during business hours and at 2am, with senior staff and new hires. Consistency that does not depend on who is available.
Calls and web inquiries are captured and acknowledged at any hour. No voicemail dead ends. No overnight gaps. No weekend black holes.
Your firm's question set, delivered consistently on every call. Human-like pacing and transitions — not a robotic Q&A. Same quality regardless of time of day.
Calls are routed according to rules your firm sets — by practice area, urgency, language, or case type. No AI making routing judgment calls outside your defined parameters.
Follow-up triggers are system-enforced, not memory-dependent. Scheduled callbacks, reminder sequences, and escalation alerts fire automatically per your defined rules.
Your team receives structured intake summaries by practice area, language, and urgency — not raw call transcripts. Decision-ready information.
Every interaction is logged and auditable. What was asked, what was captured, what was routed, and when. Full visibility for compliance review and supervision.
The consultation maps your firm's intake chain, identifies your highest-exposure gaps, and defines what a conservative R.I.G.S.™ deployment would look like. No commitment required.
Request Your Free Intake Review →Every step governed. Every handoff logged. You stay in control.
Captured 24/7 — never missed, never sent to voicemail
Acknowledged in seconds — day, night, weekend, holiday
Runs a structured question set with human-like pacing
Your rules — AI enforces them. Every call logged and auditable
You decide. Always. AI assists — humans close.
Every step is logged, auditable, and under your control. R.I.G.S.™ doesn't replace attorney judgment — it enforces the intake standards you set, consistently, at scale.
Most firms are choosing between three paths — doing nothing, experimenting with generic AI tools, or implementing a governed framework built for legal operations.
| No SystemStatus quo — voicemail, staff, memory | Generic AI ToolsDIY, generalist agencies, staff experiments | R.I.G.S.™Recommended |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Availability & Coverage | |||
| 24/7 after-hours intake coverage | ✕ | Varies | ✓ |
| Overnight and weekend call capture | ✕ | Varies | ✓ |
| Spanish & multilingual intake support | ✕ | Varies | ✓ |
| Consistency & Quality | |||
| Same intake quality regardless of staff on duty | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Structured scripted intake sequences | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Enforced follow-up — not memory-dependent | ✕ | Partial | ✓ |
| Review-ready summaries by practice area | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Governance & Ethics | |||
| Attorney retains all decision authority | ✓ | Unclear | ✓ |
| Firm-defined scripts, routing & rules | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Full audit trail and proof-path logging | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| ABA ethics-aligned deployment | Attorney's burden | ✕ | ✓ |
| Fit & Deployment | |||
| Built specifically for solo & boutique firms | N/A | ✕ | ✓ |
| Conservative rollout — one gap at a time | N/A | ✕ | ✓ |
| Founder with legal operations background | N/A | ✕ | ✓ |
| Bottom line | Cases slip through gaps you can't see | Tools without legal governance create new risk | Governed. Conservative. Built for your firm. |
This comparison reflects general capability differences between deployment approaches — not a review of any specific vendor or product.
The consultation is free. The gap map is yours to keep. No commitment required.
Request Your Free Intake Review →R.I.G.S.™ governs intake. Case Lens handles what comes after — the medical record analysis, chronologies, and summaries that determine how your PI and disability cases are built and valued.
Both products share the same forensic foundation — built by a former vocational expert who has reviewed thousands of medical records in SSA, VA, workers' comp, and personal injury contexts.
The patterns R.I.G.S.™ was built to address are consistently reported across legal industry research. These are not edge cases — they are the norm for firms without governed intake infrastructure.
The American Bar Association has issued formal guidance on attorney use of AI tools — covering competence obligations, supervision requirements, confidentiality, and disclosure. R.I.G.S.™ is designed around these guidelines from the ground up — not retrofitted for compliance after the fact.
Every deployment includes a jurisdiction-specific ethics review of scripts, routing logic, and disclosure language before any system goes live.
Review Our ABA AI Ethics Alignment →The intake gap is documented. The solution is governed, conservative, and built around your ethics. The next step is a free 20-minute intake review.
Request Your Free Intake Review →We map your firm's intake chain, identify your highest-exposure gaps, and give you a clear picture of what you're actually losing — whether we work together or not. No commitment. No pressure.
AI assists. · Humans decide. · Systems enforce consistency.